Cricket

The recent Test series between India and New Zealand has reignited the debate over the duration of the longest format of cricket. With matches increasingly ending within three days, former India captain Dilip Vengsarkar believes it's time to officially reduce Tests to four days.Vengsarkar argues that the financial burden on weaker ICC members is a significant factor. He points out that teams like the West Indies struggle to afford travel and expenses for five-day Tests. Additionally, he believes it's unfair to sell tickets for five days when matches are often over in three.The advent of DRS has also contributed to the shorter duration of Tests. Marginal decisions now favor bowlers, making it more challenging for batters to survive. The post-T20 era has also seen a decline in batting technique and temperament, as head coach Gautam Gambhir has noted.Vengsarkar's proposal has been echoed by other former players, including Michael Vaughan and Shane Warne. The ICC considered the idea of four-day Tests in 2018, but the MCC, the custodians of cricket laws, ultimately decided to maintain the five-day format.However, the MCC did acknowledge some benefits of four-day Tests. In recent years, there have been a few sanctioned four-day Tests, including England vs. Ireland in 2023 and South Africa vs. Zimbabwe. In India, Ranji Trophy matches are played over four days.Another aspect of the Mumbai Test was the enthusiastic crowd attendance. Vengsarkar suggests that the BCCI should schedule Tests only in major cities and metros, while awarding white-ball matches to smaller centers. He believes that Test cricket should be concentrated in venues like New Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Bengaluru, and Chennai.

The dominance of left-arm spinners in Test cricket against India has become increasingly evident in recent years, with the likes of Ajaz Patel and Mitchell Santner wreaking havoc on Indian batters. While the quality of pitches and the advent of DRS have contributed to this trend, there are also fundamental flaws in the technique of modern-day batsmen that have exacerbated the problem.Former India batter WV Raman attributes the decline in batsmanship against left-arm spin to the T20 mindset, which emphasizes hard hands and a bat that doesn't come down straight. This makes the outside edge more vulnerable to balls that turn away. Rahul Dravid was a notable exception, but his ability to adjust his bat at the point of contact is a rare skill.Sunil Subramaniam, another former left-arm spinner, believes that the tendency to play beside the line and jab at the ball is making modern-day batters susceptible to left-arm spin. This is in contrast to the likes of Sachin Tendulkar, who rarely struggled against the ball turning away playing a defensive shot.Subramaniam also highlights the importance of playing spinners from the hands, rather than trying to read them from the pitch. This becomes particularly challenging on sharp turners.The absence of Cheteshwar Pujara, who possessed the correct technique to deal with left-arm spin, has further weakened India's batting lineup.

Rishabh Pant's valiant half-century in the third and final Test against New Zealand at the Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai was a beacon of hope for Team India, but his controversial dismissal left a bitter taste in the mouths of fans and pundits alike.With India reeling at 29/5 in pursuit of 147 runs for victory, Pant entered the fray and played a counterattacking knock, reaching his fifty in just 48 balls. His aggressive approach gave India a glimmer of hope, but his innings was cut short in the 22nd over.Ajaz Patel's delivery initially appeared to miss Pant's bat, but replays indicated a spike on UltraEdge as the ball passed. The on-field umpire initially ruled not out, but New Zealand captain Tom Latham and Patel convinced him to review the decision.After a tense wait, the third umpire ruled in favor of the fielding team, much to the dismay of Pant and the Indian team. Pant briefly contested the decision with the on-field umpire before expressing his disappointment in the dressing room.Despite the setback, Pant finished the three-match series as the top run-scorer with 261 runs at an average of 43.50 and a strike rate of 89.38. His impressive performance included three half-centuries, with a highest score of 99.Pant's dismissal sparked a heated debate on social media, with many fans and experts questioning the decision. Some argued that the sound on UltraEdge could have been caused by Pant's bat hitting his pads, while others maintained that the ball had clearly nicked the bat.The incident highlighted the challenges of using technology in cricket and the fine line between a legitimate dismissal and an unfortunate error. It also served as a reminder of the immense pressure that players face in high-stakes matches.Despite the loss, Pant's fighting spirit and determination left a lasting impression on fans. His performance in the series showcased his ability to counterattack on challenging pitches and his unwavering belief in his team.

Controversy Erupts in Emerging Asia Cup Semi-Final as Umpire Reverses Decision Without DRSA dramatic controversy unfolded during the semi-final of the Emerging Asia Cup between India A and Afghanistan A in Oman, as an umpire reversed a key decision without using the Decision Review System (DRS).The incident occurred when Afghanistan opener Zubaid Akbari was initially ruled not out after an appeal for a catch behind the stumps. However, following a lengthy consultation with the third umpire, despite the absence of DRS, Akbari was given out, sparking outrage from the Afghanistan camp.Akbari, who had scored 64 off 41 balls, refused to leave the field, raising his hand in protest. The situation escalated when the Afghanistan coach instructed Akbari to stay on the field, leading to a heated discussion between officials and coaching staff from both teams.The controversial reversal of the decision created tension, with both coaching units debating the ruling. Despite the setback, Afghanistan A posted a formidable total of 206/4, the highest score of the tournament, led by a 137-run opening partnership between Sediqullah Atal (83 off 52) and Akbari. Karim Janat added a quick 41 off 20 balls to give Afghanistan a strong finish.India A, chasing 207, stumbled early, losing five wickets by the 13th over. Ramandeep Singh and Nishant Sindhu provided late resistance with a brisk 68-run stand off 31 balls, but a miscommunication led to Sindhu's run-out, leaving India with too much to do in the final overs.Abdul Rahman held his nerve in the final over, dismissing Ramandeep on the last ball to restrict India A to 186/7, sealing a 20-run victory for Afghanistan A. They now advance to the final to face Sri Lanka A.The controversy surrounding the umpire's decision has raised questions about the use of DRS in international cricket and the potential for human error to influence the outcome of matches.

Sarfaraz Khan's astute observation and unwavering conviction played a pivotal role in India's successful review against New Zealand on Day 1 of the second Test in Pune. Despite initial skepticism from his teammates, Khan's insistence that the ball had brushed Will Young's glove prompted skipper Rohit Sharma to take a DRS, which ultimately resulted in Young's dismissal.Khan, fielding at backward short-leg, noticed a subtle noise as the ball passed Young's bat and glove. Sensing a possible contact, he approached Sharma and urged him to trust his instincts. "I knew there was contact, but there is always room for misjudgment," Khan explained. "But I heard a noise and hence, felt there was something involved."Khan's confidence stemmed from his close proximity to the action. "I was at backward short leg so when the ball was going past his bat and glove, I noticed that the bat was away from the pads. I heard a noise and that's when I went to Rohit bhai and told him, 'Rohit bhai, mere pe bharosa karo. Ball lagi hai, aap lo review. Main bol raha hu aapko, lo (Trust me. The ball has hit something, just take the review. I am telling you, take it),'" Khan said.Technical members of the broadcasting team initially expressed doubts about the contact, but the hawk-eye technology confirmed Khan's suspicions. "I did not hear the sound, as it is very feeble," said KN Srinivasa Rao, a sound supervisor. "But the hawk-eye has a different technology, which can identify the smallest of small sounds."Akanksha Pandey, the director's assistant, also admitted to being surprised by the outcome. "We were surprised when we saw the replays. We were watching the pictures that the director was cutting, and we were smiling because everybody is always convinced when they are trying to talk the captain into taking the DRS."Washington Sundar, one of India's star bowlers on the first day, praised Khan's persistence. "Honestly, I was a good 70-80 meters away from the middle, so I had no idea. I obviously didn't hear any sound, but Sarfaraz seemed to be very convinced with it. Really happy that Sarfaraz eventually convinced Rohit bhai," said Sundar.Khan's sharp observation and unwavering belief in his instincts not only contributed to Young's dismissal but also highlighted his growing influence within the Indian team. His ability to make crucial decisions under pressure is a testament to his maturity and leadership qualities.

The Women's Big Bash League (WBBL) is set to witness a significant technological upgrade in its tenth season, with the introduction of a third umpire in every game and an increase in matches utilizing the Decision Review System (DRS).To enhance the accuracy of on-field decisions, the WBBL will implement a third umpire for the first time. This additional official will be responsible for reviewing close calls and providing assistance to the on-field umpires.Furthermore, the league will expand the use of DRS to 33 out of the 43 matches. DRS allows teams to challenge umpiring decisions related to dismissals, such as leg before wicket (LBW), caught behind, and run outs. The TV umpire will have the authority to overturn or uphold the on-field decision based on video replays.In addition to the expanded DRS coverage, the WBBL will introduce an innings timer. Similar to the Big Bash League (BBL), teams will have 73 minutes to be ready to bowl the first ball of the 20th over. Failure to meet this deadline will result in a fielding penalty, requiring an extra fielder inside the circle.The implementation of these technological advancements aims to improve the fairness and accuracy of the game. Alistair Dobson, the head of Big Bash Leagues, emphasized the importance of world-class technology in a world-class competition. He believes that the expanded DRS coverage, TV umpire availability, and innings timer will enhance the viewing experience and provide a more consistent and fair playing field for the players.The tenth season of the WBBL kicks off on October 27 with a triple-header day. Defending champions Adelaide Strikers will face Brisbane Heat in a rematch of last season's final, followed by Melbourne Renegades against Sydney Sixers at the same venue. Perth Scorchers will then host Melbourne Stars at the WACA.

Rohit Sharma's Disbelief as DRS Overturns Umpire's Decision in India vs. Bangladesh TestOn the opening day of the second Test between India and Bangladesh in Kanpur, Indian captain Rohit Sharma's reaction to a successful Decision Review System (DRS) call went viral on the internet.After pacer Akash Deep's initial LBW appeal against Shadman Islam was denied by the on-field umpire, Deep urged Sharma to review the decision. Despite initial hesitation, Sharma agreed, and the DRS confirmed the dismissal, much to his surprise.The delivery, angled in from around the wicket, straightened and hit Islam's pads. Deep's confident appeal was initially met with denial, but the DRS showed the ball hitting the leg stump, leading to Islam's departure for 24.Sharma's reaction, a mix of disbelief and amusement, captured the attention of viewers. The Indian players erupted in celebration, congratulating Deep for his persistence and the successful DRS call.The incident highlighted the importance of DRS in modern cricket, allowing umpires to rectify potential errors and ensure fair play. It also showcased the growing confidence of Indian bowlers in using technology to their advantage.Earlier in the day, Sharma won the toss and elected to bowl first on a Green Park Stadium track that offered bounce and carry. India lead the two-match series 1-0 after a comprehensive victory in Chennai.

Steve Smith's 'Brain Fade' Moment: A Controversial Incident in the 2017 Border-Gavaskar TrophyThe 2017 Border-Gavaskar Trophy series between India and Australia was a highly anticipated event, marked by intense rivalry and thrilling matches. However, one incident during the second Test in Bengaluru overshadowed the sporting spectacle and sparked a major controversy.Steve Smith, the Australian captain at the time, found himself at the center of a storm after he was caught seeking guidance from the dressing room while considering a review of his dismissal. During Australia's second innings, Smith was given out leg before wicket off a delivery from Umesh Yadav. After a brief discussion with his batting partner, Peter Handscomb, Smith was seen glancing towards the dressing room for advice on whether to review the decision using the DRS (Decision Review System).This act of seeking external guidance is strictly prohibited under the rules of cricket, as players on the field are not allowed to consult with anyone outside the playing area for reviews. Indian captain Virat Kohli immediately protested, and the on-field umpires intervened, denying Smith the opportunity to review the decision.The incident sparked a heated exchange between Kohli and Smith, with Kohli accusing the Australian of abusing the DRS. Smith later admitted that his actions were a "brain fade," a momentary lapse in judgment. However, the incident cast a shadow over the match and added to the already tense atmosphere between the two teams.The controversy surrounding Smith's actions extended beyond the match itself. Kohli hinted that it might have been a recurring tactic by the Australians, although no further proof was provided. The incident raised questions about the ethics of using technology in cricket and the importance of upholding the spirit of the game.Despite the controversy, Smith remained a key figure in the series, finishing as the highest run-getter on either side with 499 runs, including three centuries. However, the 'brain fade' moment remains a defining moment in his career and a reminder of the importance of adhering to the rules and respecting the integrity of the sport.

Rohit Sharma, India's esteemed captain, has faced criticism for his questionable DRS decisions. During the first Test against Bangladesh in Chennai, Rohit's refusal to review a caught-behind decision left him with a face-palm moment.In the 62nd over, Bangladesh batter Hasan Mahmud faced Ravichandran Ashwin's delivery. The ball spun sharply and bounced high, hitting Mahmud's glove before being caught by wicket-keeper Rishabh Pant. However, replays suggested the ball may have grazed Mahmud's forearm before entering Pant's gloves.Despite Pant's insistence on taking DRS, Rohit remained adamant. The replays later confirmed that the ball had indeed touched Mahmud's glove, meaning a review would have resulted in an overturned decision.Pant couldn't resist teasing Rohit, saying, "Out tha, abe yaar replay dekh to lo (it was out, at least see the replay)."Despite the DRS blunder, India secured a comprehensive 280-run victory, taking a 1-0 lead in the series.After the match, Rohit praised Pant's remarkable return to Test cricket after a 600-day absence. "He's been through some really tough times. The way he has managed himself through those tough times was superb to watch," Rohit said.Rohit's DRS decision-making has been a topic of discussion among cricket pundits. Some believe his reluctance to review decisions stems from a desire to maintain control on the field. Others suggest it may be a lack of confidence in the DRS system.Regardless of the reasons, Rohit's DRS decisions have raised questions about his captaincy. As India prepares for the upcoming Test series against Australia, Rohit will need to improve his DRS decision-making to ensure the team's success.