Tennis

Jack Draper, the rising British tennis star, has overcome the mental turmoil caused by a controversial match point in Cincinnati to make a strong start at the US Open.Draper, ranked 25th in the world, has reached the third round in New York without dropping a set, defeating Zhang Zhizhen and Facundo Diaz Acosta in straight sets. The 22-year-old is making up for lost time after missing much of last season due to injuries.However, Draper's recent success has been overshadowed by the controversy surrounding his match point against Felix Auger-Aliassime in Cincinnati. Chair umpire Greg Allensworth missed a crucial call, awarding the point to Draper despite the ball bouncing twice before clearing the net.The incident sparked widespread criticism on social media, with many accusing Draper of cheating. Draper initially offered to replay the point but ultimately left the decision to the umpire. He later admitted that the controversy affected him in the following match, which he lost to Holger Rune."It was a bit of a storm last week," Draper said. "I played three tough matches there, and then in the match against Holger, I wasn't all there. I was not only physically tired, but mentally sort of bamboozled by the night before."Draper has since recovered from the incident and is focused on competing at the US Open. He is on course for a rematch with 2022 champion Carlos Alcaraz in the next round."I've played him a couple of times on hard courts, and it's a different ballgame," Draper said. "If I do play him, I'll be expecting a very different Carlos Alcaraz out there than the one I played in Queens' Club. But I'm looking forward to that battle."The US Open has implemented an expanded video review system, allowing players to challenge incidentals like the one that occurred in Cincinnati. Draper believes this will improve the officiating system."It's very easy to see on the slow-mo replay from the side of the court that, in that situation, it was an illegal shot," Draper said. "But anyone who's playing the game out there knows it's not always easy in that situation to actually know what happened."

Felix Auger-Aliassime's promising run at the Cincinnati Open came to an abrupt and controversial end in the Round of 16 against Jack Draper. The Canadian star was on the cusp of leveling the match when a contentious decision by chair umpire Greg Allensworth handed the victory to Draper.Draper's match-point shot appeared to bounce twice on his side of the court before clearing the net, which should have awarded the point to Auger-Aliassime. However, without access to instant replay, Allensworth ruled in Draper's favor, sparking a heated debate on the court.Auger-Aliassime, who had earlier defeated Casper Ruud in convincing fashion, was visibly frustrated by the decision. He engaged in a lengthy discussion with both Draper and the umpire, arguing that the point should have been awarded to him due to the double bounce."Did you not see the ball bounce on the court?" Auger-Aliassime asked the umpire."I did not see that," Allensworth replied.Despite Auger-Aliassime's protests and a subsequent intervention by the tournament supervisor, the umpire's decision stood, and Draper advanced with a 5-7, 6-4, 6-4 victory.The incident has reignited calls for broader implementation of video review systems in tennis, similar to those used at the US Open. While the US Open has invested in this technology, most other tournaments, including the Cincinnati Open, have not, leaving players and fans frustrated when critical points are decided by potentially incorrect human judgment.This issue is not new; players like Denis Shapovalov and Daniil Medvedev have previously raised concerns about the consistency and accuracy of officiating in tennis.Auger-Aliassime expressed confidence that the umpire would realize the error once he reviewed the footage after the match. "It's going to look ridiculous," he said. Draper, too, seemed uncertain about the legitimacy of the point, indicating that he would have been willing to continue the match if a replay had been available.The controversy surrounding Auger-Aliassime's match has highlighted the need for improved officiating tools in tennis. Video review systems can provide a more accurate and consistent way to adjudicate close calls, reducing the potential for human error and ensuring that matches are decided fairly.