India's knowledge of their T20 World Cup 2024 semi-final venue in Guyana has sparked controversy, with former players and pundits questioning the fairness of the arrangement.
India captain Rohit Sharma downplayed the advantage, but Sanjay Manjrekar believes it influenced India's team selection, particularly their inclusion of four spinners. Nick Knight echoed this sentiment, stating that it "didn't seem right or fair."
Michael Vaughan went further, accusing the ICC of favoring India due to their financial contributions. He criticized the scheduling, which allowed India to play all their matches in the morning for prime-time viewing in India.
Knight also questioned the ICC's decision to have different rules for the semi-finals, with Afghanistan and South Africa having a reserve day while India and England did not. He suggested condensing the group stages and moving the final to Sunday to avoid such situations.
Manjrekar urged the ICC to prioritize a level-playing field over commercial gains. He argued that the focus should be on creating a high-quality product rather than catering solely to market demands.
The controversy highlights the tension between the ICC's desire to maximize revenue and the need to ensure fairness and integrity in the sport. It remains to be seen how the ICC will address these concerns in future tournaments.
Tags: #T20WorldCup, #India, #Advantage, #Fairness, #ICC
Read more
Share:
Kemar Roach Ruled Out of West Indies Test Tour of England
Kohli's T20 World Cup Woes Continue with Single-Digit Dismissal in Semi-Final