Cricket

Cricket South Africa (CSA) has reaffirmed its commitment to bilateral fixtures with Afghanistan, despite criticism over the Taliban's repressive policies towards women. CSA believes that isolating the Afghan men's team would be ineffective and unjust, as it would punish innocent players for the actions of their government.CSA's stance aligns with the International Cricket Council (ICC), which has expressed concern over the lack of a women's team in Afghanistan but has not imposed a ban. The ICC recognizes the complexities of forcing the Afghanistan Cricket Board (ACB) to field a women's team, given the potential risks to their safety.CSA argues that gender advocacy in cricket should not come at the expense of innocent administrators and players. It points to its own history of isolation during the Apartheid era, which did not effectively promote change. Instead, economic sanctions proved more effective in breaking the regime's resistance.CSA also acknowledges the progress made by the ACB in promoting women's cricket prior to the Taliban's takeover. In 2020, the ACB pledged contracts to 25 female players and organized a training camp. However, the Taliban's ban on female participation in sports has halted these efforts.The South African Cricketers' Association (SACA) supports CSA's position, calling for the promotion of women's rights while recognizing the challenges faced by the ACB. South Africa's ODI captain, Temba Bavuma, has also expressed his support for women's rights.CSA's decision to continue playing Afghanistan has drawn criticism from some quarters, including Lawyers for Human Rights, which argues that it tacitly endorses the Taliban regime. However, CSA believes that engagement and dialogue are more effective than isolation in promoting change.

The ICC's partnership with UNICEF to empower girls through cricket faces a stark contrast with the Taliban's suppression of women's rights in Afghanistan. While the Afghanistan men's cricket team has achieved remarkable success, the country's women are denied basic freedoms.The ICC's dilemma lies in balancing its commitment to gender equality with the potential consequences of banning Afghanistan for violating its charter. The Taliban's allowance of men's cricket is a calculated move to appease Pakhtun men, a source of their power.However, the Taliban's sensitivity to international perception suggests that cricket embargos could have an impact. By turning its back on the Afghanistan men's team, the ICC would not only punish the players but also send a strong message to the Taliban.The situation echoes the Apartheid era in South Africa, where many talented cricketers were denied international careers due to the racist policies of the government. While the role of cricket in the fall of Apartheid is debatable, it undoubtedly contributed to the pressure on the regime.Today, South Africa faces challenges in implementing transformation targets in its sports teams, highlighting the ongoing tensions between politics and sport. The Afghanistan situation presents a similar dilemma, where a response must be both effective and politically feasible.As consumers of the sport, we have a responsibility to inform the direction taken by governing bodies. By understanding the complexities of the situation, we can contribute to a solution that balances the pursuit of gender equality with the potential consequences for the Afghanistan men's cricket team.